Never miss an update

Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Material: Leather
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Brand: Naya
Fastening: Buckle Color: Black
Occasion: Wear to Work Width: Wide (C, D, W)
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 6.5 Style: Slingbacks
UPC: 093631199687
Never miss an update

Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c -

    Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c
    Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c
    Report Mylie Toe Back Strap Mules, Blue, 7.5 US DisplayStyle Shoes by Nasty Gal Build Me Up Wedge Rose Gold Patent Sneaker Sz 6US $70 , FABULICIOUS SHOES SIZE 8M Clear Shoes LIP108/C/MGentleman/Lady Very stylish high-heeled women shoes Queensland Lush design Brand feastBella Vita Wow Square Pointed Toe Classic Pumps, Bone, 8 USBella Vita Wow Classic Pumps, Pewter, 9 W US DisplayGentlemen/Ladies Frau Women's Classy Sneakers the most convenient At a lower price Characteristics , new nine west banner sz 6 cut out zip back shootie pumpLauren Ralph Lauren Shaylee Dress Wedge Pumps 051, Black, 10 USBella Vita Wow Square Pointed Toe Classic Pumps, Navy, 9 US , Clarks Maritsa Nila Heels - Women's Size 7M, Black , Chelsea & Zoe Parnika Peep-Toe Sandals, Red Microfiber, 6US DisplayCole Haan Shoes Womens 6 Black Patent Leather Nikeair PumpsHUNTER AMAZONAS Women's 8 Rubber Sole High Heel Slip On Leather Sheepskin BrazilFABULICIOUS SHOES SIZE 8M Clear Shoes FLA408/C/M , A35 Step N Flex Daleah Block-Heel Pumps 374, Anthracite, 8 USA35 Ashiaa Ankle Strap Pumps 695, Black Patent, 8.5 USI35 Kenjay4 D'Orsay Rhinestone Pumps 772, Black, 6 W US , Rodolphe Menudier Womens Shoes Size 37.5 7.5 Black Solid Strappy Heels PumpsCarlos by Carlos Santana Storm Casual Pumps 830, Black, 8.5 US / 38.5 EUSC35 Cathiee Wedge Rhinestone Evening Pumps 845, Black, 7 US , NWOB AEROSOLES Women’s Shoes Scorepad Nude Patent Low Heels Size 8.5 M , A35 Ashiaa Ankle Strap Pumps 169, Black Suede, 7.5 USCarlos by Carlos Santana Storm Casual Pumps 914, Black, 7.5 US / 37.5 EU , Peep Toe Gladiator Shoes Women Pumps Denim High Heels Cutout Large Size 33-43Men/Women Aldo Fidenza Silver Pump 9 durability Orders are welcome Very good color , I35 Zennora Kitten Heel Booties 539, Black, 7 USNina Novelle Rhinestone Slingback Pumps, Taupe, 5 US / 35 EU , Easy Spirit Shoes Black Herringbone Fabric Low Heels 2.25 inch 7 M NEW SMARTSHOE
    Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c ->Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c -
    Muk Luks Women's Demi Winter Boot Navy 8 M US , Womens New Balance MINIMUS IONIX Textile Purple Running Trainers W3090PY1 , VINCE Blythe Over The Knee Boots 263, Black, 6 US / 36 EU , FRYE Women's Flynn Omaja Short Inside Zip Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/Color , JIMMY CHOO 'Dylan' black leather gold buckle biker boots 38Gentleman/Lady Miss Louise Boots Selling New style Excellent functionB35 Dove Block Heel Casual Ankle Booties 194, Banana Bread, 8 USClarks Gilmore Chelsea Mens Leather Ankle Boot , Camper Fidelia Mary Jane Green Leather Buckle Wedge Square Toe Shoes Size 38 New , Prada Bright Green Black Canvas Black Patent Bow Adorable Flats Shoes 39.5 8.5$395 Ferragamo My Joy Black Patent Leather 5/5.5/6/6.5/7/7.5/8/8.5/9/9.5/10 "B" , MOT-CLe 6447 Black Grey Leather Sparkly Wedge Platform Pumps 39.5 / US 9.5 , Tidewater Sandals Women's Fish Print Flip Flop Blue/Pink/Green Thong Sandals , Adidas Court Femme Women's Shoes Size 5.5Burberry Philly Malt Brown Bridle Studs Sandal US 9 / Ankle Wrap StrapSaint Laurent Women's Multi-Color Suede Leather Ankle Strap Flat Sandals 8 8.5 , NEW POINTER MEN'S SHOES SIZE US 10.5Gentleman/Lady Air Jordan 15 retro Excellent value Selected materials Various latest designsJordan Retro 8 Bugs Bunny Size 11.5 , Skechers Mens Zimsey Navy Sneaker, Navy/Gray, 52730NVY , Man/Woman Ariat Boots 11d Stillwater Gator Caiman Wear resistant At a lower price Most practical2018 Mens British Loafers Shoes Slip On Dress Casual Wedding Velvet Splice Pumps , Retro Mens British Manual High Top Real Leather Ankle Boots Shoes European 2018WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS CROCS STRETCH SOLE [200342 BLACK] , Nike Air Max Plus Ultra Glacier Blue White 881560-400 New Women's Shoes Size 6.5 , Man's/Woman's Women's Bass Juno Boots Size 11 Many varieties Low price The first batch of customers' comprehensive specifications , Winter Womens Over the Knee High Snow Boots Fox fur Fur Lined Suede Warm ShoesAdidas Women’s White Neon Green Outdoor CW Choleah Boot Sneaker Size US 8 NWBDirty Laundry by Chinese Laundry Women's Pinnacle Boot Charcoal 7 M US , FERRINI BROWN LEATHER OSTRICH INLAY TRIM COWBOY WESTERN BOOTS WOMEN'S 7.5 B
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Women’s Naya Fandango Black Leather 29978 Shoes Heels Naya 45522001 New Size 6.5 Wide W 45522001 5d0bb9c