Never miss an update

$198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Via Spiga
Fastening: Elastic Style: Pumps
Toe Style: Pointed Width: Medium (B, M)
Exact Heel Height: 3 1/8 in. Color: Grey
Country/Region of Manufacture: China Heel Height: High (3 to 4 1/4)
Sub Style: Pointed Toe/ Mary Janes Heel Type: Slim
Main Color: Light Grey Material: Suede
UPC: 736701931427 Occasion: Casual
DSB sku: G8615 US Shoe Size (Women's): 7.5
Never miss an update

$198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16 -

    $198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16
    $198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16
    Salvatore Ferragamo Pumps Women's Brown Shoes DE 40968 G47 Size 7.5 B , SOFFT Light Brown Suede Leather Pumps Bow Detail 7.M NWOB , Earth Women's Kristy Bootie Admiral Blue 11 C/D USNew NIB Diane von Furstenberg Tmoro 'Remy' Sandal, V1359777TMCAFBLN, 7.5Fabulicious LIP-158 Taupe Nubuck/Clear 5" High Heels Multi-Stones Sexy SandalsStuart Weitzman Black Suede Dress Platform Heel Booties Shoes Women's Size 10 N , Bandolino Women's Norcia D'Orsay Pump Light Grey Satin PumpsKATY PERRY THE KAI OPEN TOE HEEL SHOES NEW SIZE 9.5Women's BEVERLY FELDMAN Black Suede PRETTY GIRL Pumps Size 8.5 Med NEW with BOXDevious Women's Domina-108 Sandal Silver/Metallic Polyurethane 11 M USJ Lo Jennifer Lopez Marisa Snake Skin Strappy High Heels Womens Sandals 9.5 MBanana Republic Maisy Ribbon Tie Pump, Tan SIZE 7 , Swedish Hasbeens Size 35 Green Leather Pumps Stacked Block Heel Sky High Tassel , VINTAGE Women's SHOES Vaneli Sling Back 8.5 BEIGE Casual Heels NEVER WORN In BoxVC Diana Embellished Snake-Print Sandal SZ 36.5 US 6.5 NEWGracienne NWOB $398 Heels 4" Stiletto Patent Brown Toile Open Toe Size 11 Pump , Via Spiga Adra Ankle Cuff Dress Sandals, Russet, 10 US / 41.5 EU DisplayBRAND NEW VIA SPIGA VERO CUDIO DESIGNED IN ITALY ANIMAL PRINT PUMPS, 6.5 , Women's Stuart Weitzman Silver Snakeskin Leather High Heels Size 10.5 , Gentlemen/Ladies T strap pumps / heels 7 Complete specification Brand wonderfulSexy Eel Skin YSL Stacked Peep Toe Heels! Worn for photo shoots only! Sz 37 1/2Pleaser Women's Bliss-31 Black Patent 9 M US , Anne Klein Black RP Sling Back Low Heel Dress Work Office Shoes Womens , Talbots Brown and Beige Calf Hair Pumps Size 10.5VEUC Tory Burch Silver Leather Wedges Shoes Heels Size 6MVia Spiga Prim Ankle Strap Mules, Burgundy, 5.5 US / 35.5 EU Display , Badgley Mischka Layla Ivory Satin Women's Evening Peep Toe Heels Pumps Size 9Badgley Mischka Pearson Vanilla Satin Women's Dressy Evening Heels Pumps Size 7Badgley Mischka Awake Platino Glitter Women's Evening Wedge Heels Pumps Size 7.5
    $198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16 ->$198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16 -
    NIB HUNTER Navy Original Tour Tall Rain Boots Shoes US 6 , FENDI NEW ICE HEEL BLACK ANKLE BOOTIES/BOOTS/HEEL $1300 (SIZE 40/FITS 8.5~9)Oliver Boots HS66-396 Structual 300mm Pull On Firefighters Boots , Adidas Originals Tubular Shadow Ck Men's Sneakers Shoes Textile Gym Shoe NewNike Air Max Sequent 3 [921694-008] Men Running Shoes Platinum/Black/WhiteRieker 537A6-10 Eastside Modern Summer Loafers in Sky Blue SizeRODOLPHE MENUDIER RODO BLACK PATENT LEATHER POINTED TOE MULES HEELS SHOES 38 7TODS 39 8.5 9 Gray Suede Booties , Alexander Wang black suede studded platform wrap around heels 38TEVA WOMENS SANDALS YSIDRO UNIVERSAL Cognac BROWN 1015121 Strappy 9 , Louboutin : Escarpins Vendome Strass 120 Version Anthracite EU38.5, US8.5,UK5.5NIKE AIR FORM ZM ZOOM HI-TOPS Football Cleats SIZE 15 Blue & Silver , NEW Nike Zoom Kobe KB 24 Mens Basketball Shoes 9.5 Black/Purple/Grey MSRP$140 , USED MENS NIKE AIR JORDAN XIII 13 RETRO Altitude 2005 EDITION 310004 031 SZ 9Nike Air Jordan Retro 6 Infrared White 384664-123 Size 11 White Infrared Black , Nike Kobe 10 X BLACKOUT Persian Violet Lakers GOLD Purple Black Panther Sz 9.5 , New Balance Men's 1540v2 Running Shoe BlackKlogs Boca Closed Back Unisex Comfort Clogs - Enamel Blue - 14 Wide , Jimmy Choo New Troy Men’s Burgundy Leather Boots 10.5 $ 395.00Gentlemen/Ladies PUMA Men's Future XT-Runner Translucent Sneaker Long-term reputation Carefully selected materials Official websiteNIB $245 Hugo Boss Cordoba Loafer By Hugo Boss (US 7 ) , Nike Wmns Viale Black Orange Pulse White Women Running Shoes Sneakers AA2185-005NIKE WOMENS AIR HUARACHE RUN SZ 6 IGLOO MINT WOLF GREY WHITE 634835 303 , Nike Air Max 90 Thea Ult PRM women's low-top sneakers casual shoes NEW , Brooks Dyad 8 Womens Running Shoes (2E) (051) + Free Aus Delivery , Gentleman/Lady NEW GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI OUTSEASON WOMENS SKYLAR New Listing low cost Recommended today , Jessica Simpson Pumella Thigh Fashion Chocolate Leather Pointed Block Heel Boot , LkNew Girls Women’s NORTH FACE Faux Fur Lined Waterproof Winter Boots Size 7Marc Fisher Womens HUMOR2 Fabric Almond Toe Over Knee Fashion, Blue, Size 5.5 , Joseph Seibel Black Leather Peep Toe Ankle Boots Womens Size M
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    $198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    $198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    $198 VIA SPIGA MACEY 7.5 Grey Suede Designer Pointed $198 Toe Heels Mary Jane Pumps Heels 7.5 0282e16