Never miss an update

$895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Costume National
Width: Medium (B, M) US Shoe Size (Women's): 11
Heel Type: Block Color: Black
Material: Leather Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up)
Occasion: Casual Fastening: Zip
Pattern: Solid Style: Ankle Boots
Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy UPC: 8032990925751
Never miss an update

$895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c - blurrypron.com

    $895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c
    $895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c
    USA CHIPPEWA LEATHER WESTERN COWBOY TRAIL BOSS RANCH WORK KILTIE BOOTS 7.5 MGravati Wilson & Dean Wilkes Bashford Taupe Suede Chukka Gumlite Sole Size 7.5 MHENRY BEGUELIN 'EBANO' BUCKLED WOMEN LOW HEEL BIKER RIDING BOOTS US 7.5 , RALPH LAUREN COLLECTION Leather Leopard Pony Hair Riding Moto Boot 9M Italy RAREAQUATALIA BY MARVIN K Womens 'Ully' Black Leather Knee High Boots Sz 39 , Taryn Rose Catherine Women's Grey Suede Over Knee Boot Sz 9 2650 * , Man/Woman Stuart Weitzman 9.5 Boots Crazy price, Birmingham a variety of TRUEL.K. BENNETT Womens Burgundy Suede Leather Ankle Booties Sz 38.5 - 218044Etre 619 Gray Leather / Geometric Heel Zip-Up Ankle Boots 37.5 / US 7.5PAUL GREEN Womens Black Suede Ankle Boots Sz US-5.5 / UK-3 NEW! 229885 , SUPPER SEXY!!! HERVE LEGER "MERCER" SNAKE-PRINT LEATHER ANKLE BOOTS SIZE 8.5NIB GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI FAB BEIGE CORSET BOOTS 36LUCCHESE BYRUNDY BOOTS USA DISTRESSED RANCH WORK BOOTS 8 B , New Ash Tuka Topo Reverse Broken Alaska Knee High Boot US Women’s Size 8.5 M , Via Spiga Beline Over the Knee Boot Size 6LOGAN BOOTS COMPANY WITCHITA KANSAS BLACK ALLIGATOR LEATHER WESTERN BOOTS 5,5 BJ. Crew Penelope Chilvers Cubana boots 08974 $425 green velvet sz 36, 6 US , ALAIA PARIS Brown Leather Stud detail Ankle Boots Sz 38.5 180764PKALBERTO FERMANI Womens Black Leather Ankle Booties Sz 40.5 NEW! 229833Breathless Christian Louboutin Pony Fur Patchwork JS Shoe 100 Ankle Boots 36 , Women's L.A.M.B. MAYOR 228813 lizard print white pointy toe booties sz. 8Marc Jacobs Georgia Studded Cowboy Western Boots, Black/Camel Multi, 7 US / 37 , Lamica Ellesy Mid Heel Women's Dress/Casual Italian Knee High BootAlberto Fermani CHIARA Brown Leather Short Pull-On Boots stock heels sz. 37 $495Taryn Rose Women’s Catherine Grey Over The Knee Boot Sz 8.5 2700* , S-2144999 New Balenciaga Camel Suede Boot Shoes US 7.5 Marked-37.5 , New In Box Womens Marc Fisher FANCEE Black Leather 20" Slouch Boots , STUART WEITZMAN 'Demiswoon' Over the Knee Boot - NWB SIZE 8.5 M , New TN29 Homage Tracey Neuls~Art To Wear~Rare Natural/Ivory Polka Dot Boots ~ 39 ,
    $895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c - blurrypron.com>$895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c - blurrypron.com
    Frye Womens Melissa Button Riding Leather Boots Size 7.5 B Black , Vasque Womens Pow III Ultradry Snow Sneaker, Bungee Cord/Aluminum, 6 M US , NEW JESSICA SIMPSON Women's Blue Suede Heels Size 6.5 , A. Marinelli RED Patent Cut-Out SlingBack Pumps (Very pretty) - Size 6.5 , Womens 8.5 M Stuart Weitzman Sandals Black Leather Thong Heel EUCIsaac Mizrahi Red Leather Pumps Sz.9.5M MaryJanes High Heel Shoes Made In ITALY , NEW BALANCE WOMEN'S WT410LB5 CUSHIONING TRAIL ALL TERRAIN RUNNING SHOESVaneli MEROPE 100891-250 Womens Merope Sandal 10(B)- Choose SZ/Color.NWOB$1395 Brunello Cucinelli 100%Leather Monili Stripe Beaded PeepToe Mules A176 , Womens Nike Cassic Cortez Se 902856-012 Anthracite Brand New Size 10 , NIKE KAISHI MEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS BLACK / WHITE 654473 010 NEW MULTIPLE SIZESNWOB Adidas Originals Tubular Invader Strap Grey Suede Sesame Slime Size 11.5Nike SB Bruin Hyperfeel Canvas Mens 883680-201 Khaki Skateboard Shoes Size 8Nike Shoes - 2011 Penny Zoom Rookie Pearl - White Black Foamposite - Size 10.5 , $89.99 Creative Recreation Dicoco (wheat nubuck) 3938-WHNUBMIZUNO WAVE RISE 16 MEN'S RUNNING SHOES~ SIZE 9M~NWOB , NIKE AIR HUARACHE RUN 91' QS AH8049-001 BLACK PURPLE WHITE DS SIZE: 8 , Nike Air Jordan 3 NRG “Free Throw Line” White Cement DS Size 9.5 , Authentic Puma No Mas First Round The Lottery Boston Celtics sneakers LE Rare 10 , air jordan retro 14 vibrant yellow/black size 14 worn once still mint , Ariat® Men's Spitfire Brown Bomber Boots 10021723Mens Large Size Ralph Lauren Polo Lander Multi Color Shoes 17 D..350AMen's Geox MWarrens1 Fashion Sneaker Sand Suede SZ 12.5 MSRP 140$allen edmonds 10 B 9d Tom Dick Harry Vivalas Vegas RockabillyWomens High Top Fashion Sneaker French Connection Size 9.5 , Skechers Unity Beaming Slip-On Women's Shoes Size , Dockers Sneaker 40TH201-790 Female Trainers Canvas Grey GreyNike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Triple White/Summit White Womens Running ALL NEW , Nike Women Zoom Vapor 9.5 Tour Tennis Shoe White/Silver 631475-101(6.5,10.5,11) , Merrell Kiandra Black Winter Waterproof Snow Boots Women's sz 9.5 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    $895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    $895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    $895 ANKLE CoSTUME NATIONAL LEATHER ANKLE mogochinese-29993 BOOTS 29987 PLATFORM CHUNKY BLOCK HEELS 41 11 7f98d4c
    Boots
    >
    ;