Never miss an update

Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: tried on...
not .
Brand: PUMA Style: Athletic
Fastening: Lace Up Heel Type: Wedge
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 5 Width: Medium (B, M)
Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up) Shoe Size: 7
Material: Leather Color: Black
Never miss an update

Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2 -

    Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2
    Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2
    Dr. Scholl's Women's Belief Ankle Boot, Dark Grey Shadow Microfiber, 8.5 M US , Free People Hybrid Heel Boot Tan Distressed Leather Ankle Boots Size 7/37New NWT Bogs Womens Classic Tall Plaid Wide Calf Boots Size 8 , Umberto Raffini Signature Women's Vita Black Nubuck Boots M NEW!!!!!! , Caslon 'Mason' Knee High Boot in Stone (Tan) Suede - Size 7M NWTWOMENS BRONZE COUGAR SNOW RAIN WINTER WATERPROOF WEDGE BOOTS US 10 , Chinese Laundry Women's Set in Stone, Black, 8.5 M USNEW! MARC FISHER Cognac Suede Leather MLYAMIR Pointed Toe Ankle Boots Sz 11 , Salvatore Ferragamo Boots Vintage Women's Sz 10 AAA Leather Pointy Toe Low Heel$229 6 M Nine West Trendon Black over the Knee High Leather Boots shoes XSZara Trafaluc Women's Chelsea Shoes Peep Toe Heels Back Zipper Blue Size 35naturalizer Tynner Triple Side Strap Boots, Grey Suede , Tommy Hilfiger Women's Boot Ankle Soffia Suede Booties Black 7.5M , sam edelman 7.5 Wide Calf Penny Riding Boots , SPERRY TOP-SIDER Womens STS99938 AERIAL BECK RAIN MOTO BLACK ZIP BOOTS SZ 10 M , Gentleman/Lady jeffrey campbell 8 Boots the most convenient delicate Very good classification , Nylo boots 38 8 leather tall distressed double zipper riding brown $625Gentle Souls Flora Suede Bootie Black SZ 9M WATERPROOF NEW , WHOLESALE DEAL,,,,,, gold mid calf boots five pairs.size 6 1/2m TO 81/2CLARKS Women's Carima Pluma Snow Boot, Brown Combo, 6.5 M US , ZARA AW 2018 Leather ANKLE BOOTS W/ZIP BUCKLES FAUX PEARL DETAILS sz 10 US 41 EUCape Robbin Hundret Dollar Money Print Pointed Stretch Thigh High Stiletto BootsCountry Love Boots Round Toe Women's Cowboy Boots W1001-1002 Brown 8 M USWomen's La Canadienne Brown Waterproof Leather Ankle Boots Size 6M MINTY! , Ladies Tony Lama Brown Lizard Skin Cowgirl Boots Size : 6.5 BMadewell $198 The Barnwood Boot 9.5 golden spinach boots suede 64511 , Stuart Weitzman Chelsea Bootie Women Black Paten Leather Made in Spain Size 5.5 , $199 MALLY RAY T. Moro Brown Leather Designer Casual Ankle ITALY Boots 6Dr. Martens Women`s Gracie 1460 Boot Black Patent Ze You Velvet US 5 ,
    Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2 ->Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2 -
    Boot Born Belindah Black Full Grain Leather , 2018 NIB WOMENS WOOLRICH BALTIMORE HARNESS BOOTS 9 $200 Sprat/ Red Plaid Wool$190 Harley Davidson Women Artesia Fur Lined Wedge Heel Boot Shoe, Black, US 8.5FAST SHIP! NWB! SZ 8 $295 FREEBIRD BY STEVEN APEX COGNAC MOTO DISTRESSED BOOTSHogan Ankle Boots Sz. 40 H277 Italy Woman Black HXW2770S870-HMYB999 PUT OFFER , New! Stuart Weitzman 9374Black Lacquered Knit Leather Boots #KW14489 Size 9 B , Levis Mens NY Runner II Low-Top Sneakers, Grey Light Grey, 10 UK , Ladies Down To Earth F50799 Suede Boots Style ~ K , SAUCONY WOMENS PEREGRINE 8 BLACK MINT BERRY SHOES 2018 **FREE POST AUSTRALIA , New Balance KA520GWY W Wide Grey White Suede Kids Preschool Shoes KA520GWYW , Bandolino NEW 7 M "Noisemaker" Dark Purple Suede Ballet Flats Bow & Studs Detail , Men's/Women's Ladies Padders Shoes - Ria selling price high quality Strong heat and heat resistance , Naturalizer Women's Terah Slingback Sandal Alabaster/Black Leather Slingbacks , Women's Sanita Brown Leather Embossed Geometric Stapled Clog Sz 39/8.5 EXCELLENT , Salvatore Ferragamo Womens Shoes Black Nubuck Suede Loafers Moc 9.5 B.Stuart Weitzman Black Suede Dress Platform Heel Booties Shoes Women's Size 10 N , Pleaser ADORE-708BMC Women's Clear Black High Heel Platform Ankle Strap SandalsPrevata Women's Contessa Slingback Sandal,Platino Raso/Platino Mesh,11 M USImagine Vince Camuto Women's Garyn Ballet Flat - Choose SZ/ColorAdidas Mens Size 13 EQT Support ADV Primeknit Athletic Shoes New , NIKE AIR HUARACHE RUN PREMIUM SZ 11 GOLD RUSH KHAKI METALLIC GOLD 704830 201 , Nike Air Max 97 UL '17 Mens 918356-201 Sepia Stone Sand Running Shoes Size 10 , $277 Tony Lama Men's Round Cognac Peanut Leather Cowboy Western Boots 10.5Allen Edmonds Burton Dress Oxfords Mens Size 7.5 E Brown Leather Apron Toe ShoesReebok Furylite FG Flight Blue/Berry-Pink BD1097 Women's SZ 8Nike Women's Air Max Thea Shoes NEW AUTHENTIC Pink/Bright Melon 599409-610 , New Balance Women 710 Vazee WVL710HB gray black WVL710HBCLARKS Women's Gracelin Mara Flat - Choose SZ/color , Aerosoles A2 by Women's sensitivity Knee High BootBernardo Women's Zoe Rain Boot, Military Rubber, 10M M US ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Womens Puma x Rihanna Fenty By bagisrecor-7584 Rihanna Sneakerboot Wedge $350 Black Size 5 $350 467c2a2